Thread:RRabbit42/@comment-31924693-20150602064250

Yesterday (UK time) I was notified of an edit by said user to the Lionel Hutz page. I checked it out and found that although it was partly a good edit, it consisted largely of adding all the categories already on the page again. Since the latter is a known bug in the visual editor (one of the many reasons I don't use the visual editor, and don't recommend that anyone else does), instead of just doing a "rvv" (I felt that it might not have been deliberate vandalism) I carefully went through the categories and removed the duplicate ones.

This morning I woke up to another change notification; it turned out that Liquidbabydoll had reverted my edit for no (stated) reason, making me suspect that her previous edit was vandalism after all. So I rolled back the page to the edit I did last night (one doesn't have to officially be a "rollback" to do this) and clicked on Liquidbabydoll's "contribs" link preparatory to reporting her; I was appalled to leearn that she's an admin! Surely admins are supposed to guard against these sort of acts, not do them themselves?

Why oh why was this user made an admin? 