Thread:DJ MC CJ/@comment-24394678-20171117222403

Hello.

So I was searching up the user "Lamarwithwalker", and I found out that it is a second account created by "Lamar31atwalker", his first account. His first account was made on May 2nd, and hasn't been active since May 4th. The second account was made on August 27th, and has been active since. It turns out that Lamar31atwalker's second account is actually not a vandal (most sockpuppets are vandals), like his first account. However, I do get annoyed by his category spamming (i.e. adding "Article stubs" and "Maintenance" to articles that aren't even stubs and incomplete/empty galleries, respectively) and other annoying shenenigans.

That comes up to a confusing question: If there are two accounts made by the same user that are both not vandalizing, then should I block the "Lamarwithwalker" account?

I'm confused, because according to your policy on multiple accounts, it says that having multiple accounts is unacceptable, and Simpsons Wiki won't block a user if one had forgotten its password or anything similar, but if a user is a vandal and creates another account, the user and the other account will be blocked, with the new one infinitely.

Also, according to your policy, it says that if a user had forgotten its password, that user can create a new account, but it must notify an admin first. If they accept, they'll either block the user's old account infinitely and add on the old user page that the user has a new account, or delete the old account.

But, in the policy, if a user is a vandal and creates another account, it will be blocked as well as the other account being blocked infinitely. Even if a user does not vandalize using it, the potential to do so is there.

In conclusion, since Lamar31atwalker's second account, Lamarwithwalker is both a good user and a minor vandal (category spamming, changing main links to redirect links on appearances pages, etc), so I'm not sure if I should block Lamarwithwalker or not. 