Thread:RRabbit42/@comment-31924693-20150602064250/@comment-25832710-20150603011309

Calling me rogue was an insult. Writing " appalled to leearn that she's an admin!" was a personal insult. Writing " Why oh why was this user made an admin?" was an insult. Bringing up the thread was to show that some are admins and don't know much. Why oh why were they made admin?

Let me answer why I was told I was made an admin. I was approached by a wikia star who manages many high traffic wikias. When I write manage, I mean truly manage. Coming in all the time and doing real managment, not coming in occasional and acting like a pompous tyrant. I was told it was thought I could be a help to this wikia. It was not I who gained my admin rights by default and took over because the original admin had not been logged in for 62 days. Look in the mirror and then ask why was __ made an adim and ask HOW also ,which is equally important.

YOu really need to read the TOS, or terms of use, user rights and good faith policies at community central.You broke a rule about insulting a specific user. You took it beyond supposedly reporting a vandalism, which there is a specific place for that, and was just trash talking.

You seriously went ballistic over a simple edit. I saw legit categories were taken out and undid it and than went back and took out some that should not have been added. Simple. There is not any way a disagreement over whether some categories apply is vandalism. Especially to someone who isn't a pompous tyrant. You did add the tapped out. It is on the edit were in the summary you wrote the unrelated personal gibberish "(rv to last good version; categories are not votes, there is no point in adding them more than once)".Another action against Wikia's rules. Ironically that edit was wrong, Lionel Hutz is not a tapped out character. You admit you know nothing about tapped out yet you added it.

Happy editing and in my native tongue, arrivederci! :)