Thread:Uptown1989/@comment-24394678-20170809214653

Hello.

I just want to ask you a question. Why do you use the "Stubs" category on articles that have enough content to NOT be a stub? Don't you understand that the category is used ONLY on articles without enough content?

For example, the World of Springfield article has enough content to NOT be a stub even though you randomly add the "Stubs" category to it for no reason. So let me tell you what the category is used for so that way you'll understand more:

The stub category is used ONLY for articles with not enough content. That's what "stub" also means on here, too. Please don't use the "Stubs" category on articles with enough content to NOT be a stub. It's not acceptable for articles with enough content to NOT be a stub and is only used for articles with little to no content to be a stub. I hope you understand that.

Jliby30 