User blog comment:Effluvium/Little angry about this!/@comment-307330-20100609004759

It may have 5,000 articles, but quantity does not mean quality. A large portion of those articles are poorly written and/or incomplete. Many more copy text directly from wikipedia. Many more are stubs consisting of a few lines. So I wouldn't say that editor was completely out of bounds for saying it.

This site has improved a lot in recent months, but it still has a long way to go. The same thing was posted at wikipedia, but it was quickly removed as being unsourced. There aren't as many active users here, which is nobody's fault, but it means there's a greater chance of stuff like that slipping through.