Me acabo de percatar de estasediciones que hiciste, comprendo que quieras agregar datos faltantes, pero esa NO es la manera en como se hace, en primera ya hay una sección de apariciones en la plantilla de los artículos de personajes relevantes de la serie y en segunda las apariciones de personajes las colocaste mal, como esto lo hiciste sin siquiera preguntar como es típico de usted me vi obligado a corregir sus 2 ediciones, esto es un llamado de atención y no me importa si esto le molesta y a causa de esto usted deje de editar en el wiki para reaparecer en 3 meses, tampoco me importa si no hablas español, creo que ya tiene suficiente tiempo como para saber que antes de hacer las cosas se consulta y usted hace las cosas a su manera, que esto no se repita o procederé a bloquearlo si no contesta o cambia su actitud
As you never answer and I do not know if it is due to the language barrier or because you simply ignore the messages, I will answer in your language.
I appreciate that you contribute to the wiki adding interwikis, not many take that hassle of organizing an article for its equivalents in other languages, but there is something that I have noticed in your editions: I have noticed that you include an interwiki in an article for each edition in a very short time, which apart from unnecessary is a junk edition, instead of that if you find interwikis do not put them one at a time for each edition, it is best to include the interwikis that you find in a single edition and not be including one for each edition you make in the pages of the wiki.
I also know about your actions in South Park Archives, so I do not rule out consulting the administration about your actions, that being said, I hope you avoid making unnecessary edits as you have been doing, also that you do not ignore and reoccur in making junk editions, of what otherwise it proceeds to a block.
As I said, I don't know why you never answer? Nothing is difficult for you to answer, you do things at your convenience that it doesn't bother you to ask an administrator if it's okay or not, well if you ignore this later, don't complain about why it happened, be warned.
It shows that you did not bother to read my warning, it is not that you can not, it is fine if you only find one every so often, but to a page you save too many times only to include several interwikis when you can easily gather the ones you find, you add and keep it, nobody is forbidding you to put interwikis, that's fine, only that you often repeat that I think you gladly ignore any warning.
You don't need any permission to add an interwiki, I just want you to be retroactive when they get your attention, I'd rather you read and then ask your questions.
you still do not understand that you are not adding an interwiki at a time in a very short time between editions, I do not know why you do not answer and ignore the warnings ?, but I will not allow that, with that it is the second warning and the third is permanent blocking and there is no going back.
Do not exaggerate, if it was hard already a while ago I would have blocked you for an error that any novice editor would do, that if it was lacking criteria, do not you think you should be more communicative and be less withdrawn when they send you notices ?.
On 2 occasions you tried to move pages without authorization and it was the filter that gave you blocking, not to mention that you didn't bother to ask, I don't know why you are so uncommunicative and because of your attention calls in south park archives I can give you an idea that you do not follow instructions and answer the warnings and on top of that you only answer with a few words.
Look, I'm not going to force you to make a speech and nothing like that, but if I wanted you to be more communicative with your actions, not only to this wiki, but in those you edit, you get an impression that you don't mind the warnings and you You close on what you think is right.
I can perfectly give you a block, but if it would be a lack of criteria and principles, but if I would like you to show a less withdrawn attitude and a little more communication, it is a tip: take it or leave it, it is your decision.
Well, I will not expand on the subject and because of your delayed way of answering it is best to close this, if you want to take it wrong it is your problem, but nothing is hard for you to be more open and communicative or at least have the audacity to ask and clear your doubts.
En efecto fuiste bloqueado, pero por accion del filtro antiabusos, de lo cual dio un falso positivo, si no fuera porque otro usuario me hubiera informado del error estarias todavia bloqueado sin razón aparente, aparte porque no dijiste nada ya sea en la central para desbloquearte?, se que no hablas español pero al menos pudiste decirme desde otro lugar y tomar acciones aunque sea en tu idioma pero al menos no quedarte de brazos cruzados por un error del filtro.
En fin espero que avises en caso de pasar que intentes informar de un error porque el filtro no distingue de los usuarios de los vándalos.