You may all know Brandon Walker, who started on here 2 years ago as "Brokenarrow2" and seemed fine at first.
Well, that user has now gone from being okay to being a complete nuisance with vandalism. Examples include:
1. Changing images in appearances pages
2. Modifying grammar that does not need modifying
3. Removing red-linked pages from appearances pages
4. Undoing edits made by admins
5. Spamming message walls with pointless facts about episodes
6. Lying to users about his vandalism even though he IS
7. Makes sockpuppets to avoid his infinite blocks
Brandon Walker is a REALLY huge problem on Simpsons Wikia right now. As for socks, according to my calculations, he has made a whooping 129 socks (130 if you count his original account)!! I'm not kidding: 129 SOCKPUPPETS. That is WAY too many socks for a vandalizer! Brandon has more socks than Claire Eales with 28 socks and Andy with 28 socks!
A few months ago, I reported Brandon Walker to the guys at FANDOM, so they can block every new sock that Brandon makes. That plan perfectly works. However, Brandon Walker STILL vandalizes, no matter how many blocks he got.
So, I am telling all of you admins that we need to come up with a plan on how to stop Brandon Walker from coming and vandalizing on this Wikia for good. We need a plan on how to permanently block Brandon FOREVER on this Wikia so that way he will not have the choice to make more sockpuppets and vandalize on here anymore.
Please help Simpsons Wikia with this problem, as Brandon Walker has gone HAYWIRE in the past few months.
Hey Jhonevans, I Would Like To Edit Some Pages. Troll Edits? Grammar Issues? Spelling Errors? Typos? Incorrect Facts? Adding Stuff? I'm Glad To Help With Fixing Any Of These! Contact Me If A Page Needs Editing, Since I Love Doing So to help out!
I've noticed that there's a <ref /> error in the article Charles Montgomery Burns, which seem to happen since the "age" parameter in Template:Character has been removed earlier this year. Since the following parts of the page also use the same age refs, yet the parameter no longer exists, the initial ref cannot be found, and an error occurs.
Therefore, i'd recommend either adding the parameter back as an optional parameter, which will only appear if it is used in that article, or to have a special section for age. Just thought i should let you guys know.
There are two pages for this store which is located in the Towne Centre at Springfielde Glenne. It is from "The D'oh-cial Network" episode which I have access to. In one shot, the first letters are cut off and perhaps some users were not sure of the name. I have posted a photo to the "Puttering Barn" page showing it is in fact called the "Puttering" barn and not the "Pottering" barn. I think the "Pottering Barn" page should be removed. Or should one direct to the other?