Simpsons Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Simpsons Wiki
Simpsons Wiki
24,639
pages
in: Simpsons Wiki, Comprehensive articles

Changes: Simpsons Wiki:Comprehensive article nominations

Back to page
Sign in to edit
No edit summary
m (update wiki name)
 
(103 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|-
  
|-
 
|
  
|
−
'''Archives:''' [[Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 1|1]]
 +
'''Archives:''' [[Simpsons Wiki:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 1|1]]
   
 
|-
  
|-
Line 16: Line 16:
   
 
== What is a comprehensive article? ==
  
== What is a comprehensive article? ==
−
A '''comprehensive article''' is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain '''''[[Wikisimpsons:Featured article|Featured article]]''''' status (our ''best'' work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Wikisimpsons, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, ''complete,'' with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to '''''let readers know when an article they are reading is complete,''''' and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. ''(For nominating these articles, see ''[[Wikisimpsons:Featured article]]''.)''
 +
A '''comprehensive article''' is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain '''''[[Simpsons Wiki:Featured article|Featured article]]''''' status (our ''best'' work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Simpsons Wiki, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, ''complete,'' with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to '''''let readers know when an article they are reading is complete,''''' and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. ''(For nominating these articles, see ''[[Simpsons Wiki:Featured article]]''.)''
   
 
== Criteria ==
  
== Criteria ==
Line 22: Line 22:
   
 
#…be well-written.
  
#…be well-written.
−
#…list all canon appearances.
 +
#…list all canon and non-canon appearances.
−
#…follow the Manual of Style and all other policies on Wikisimpsons.
 +
#…follow the Manual of Style and all other policies on Simpsons Wiki.
 
#…not be tagged with any improvement tags (i.e. image needed, stub, etc).
  
#…not be tagged with any improvement tags (i.e. image needed, stub, etc).
−
#…have all canon information presented.
 +
#…have all canon (or non-canon if this is all there is) information presented.
 
#…be completely referenced.
  
#…be completely referenced.
 
#…have all image licenses fully filled-out.
  
#…have all image licenses fully filled-out.
Line 34: Line 34:
 
<big>''How to nominate:''</big>
  
<big>''How to nominate:''</big>
   
−
#First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 +
#First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 
#Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  
#Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  ⚫
#If, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be officially known as a "comprehensive article".
−
#The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
  
⚫
#Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".
  
   
 
<big>''How to vote:''</big>
  
<big>''How to vote:''</big>
Line 46: Line 45:
 
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
−
#Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
 +
#Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the <code><nowiki>{{comp}}</nowiki></code> template can be added to the top of its page.
−
#A user can only nominate one article a month.
  
 
#All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.
  
#All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.
   
Line 53: Line 51:
   
 
== Nominations ==
  
== Nominations ==
−
=== [[Fort Fragg]] ===
 +
=== [[Opening Sequence]] ===
  +
A massive article, not likely to get featured though, that is full of pictures and information about each of the opening sequences. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 14:14, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
−
A detailed and well-written article (that I take no credit for). [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 19:43, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  
  +
  +
==== Support (2) ====
  +
#Agreed. Has had a lot of work put into it... [[User:Effluvium|Effluvium]] 20:17, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
  +
# Highly detailed. ----- It's Magic - [[User:CJC95|King]][[User talk:CJC95|cjc]] 20:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
==== Neutral (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Oppose (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Comments ====
  +
=== [[Gabbo]] ===
  +
This is a fairly long article for a character who was only the focus of one episode. It has a picture, quote and is of decent length. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 20:13, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
==== Support (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Neutral (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Oppose (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Comments ====
  +
  +
  +
==== [[Lord Montymort]] ====
  +
Great article for a character that's only made one non-canon appearance. Unlikely to get featured. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]]
  +
  +
==== Support (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Neutral(0) ====
  +
  +
==== Oppose (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Comments ====
  +
  +
==== [[Canyonero]] ====
  +
A good article for a car and it has complete song lyrics as well. <span style="font-family:Australian Sunrise">[[User:Josegiraffio|'''<span style="color:red">Jose</span><span style="color:green">giraffio</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Josegiraffio|'''Want to talk''']]</sup></span> 10:42, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
==== Support (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Neutral(0) ====
  +
  +
==== Oppose (0) ====
  +
  +
==== Comments ====
 
|}
  
|}
 
|}
  
|}
  +
  +
[[Category:Simpsons Wiki|{{PAGENAME}}]]
  +
[[Category:Comprehensive articles| ]]

Latest revision as of 05:32, 12 January 2013

Archive filingcabinent

Archives: 1

This page is to nominate minor articles as being complete, or comprehensive articles.

What is a comprehensive article?

A comprehensive article is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain Featured article status (our best work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Simpsons Wiki, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, complete, with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to let readers know when an article they are reading is complete, and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. (For nominating these articles, see Simpsons Wiki:Featured article.)

Criteria

An article must…

  1. …be well-written.
  2. …list all canon and non-canon appearances.
  3. …follow the Manual of Style and all other policies on Simpsons Wiki.
  4. …not be tagged with any improvement tags (i.e. image needed, stub, etc).
  5. …have all canon (or non-canon if this is all there is) information presented.
  6. …be completely referenced.
  7. …have all image licenses fully filled-out.
  8. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  9. …include a "Behind the Laughter" section for real world information (if any).

Nominating process

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. If, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be officially known as a "comprehensive article".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the {{comp}} template can be added to the top of its page.
  5. All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.

Note: Remember to sign your posts (~~~~).

Nominations

Opening Sequence

A massive article, not likely to get featured though, that is full of pictures and information about each of the opening sequences. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 14:14, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Support (2)

  1. Agreed. Has had a lot of work put into it... Effluvium 20:17, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Highly detailed. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Gabbo

This is a fairly long article for a character who was only the focus of one episode. It has a picture, quote and is of decent length. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:13, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support (0)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Lord Montymort

Great article for a character that's only made one non-canon appearance. Unlikely to get featured. Doh5678

Support (0)

Neutral(0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Canyonero

A good article for a car and it has complete song lyrics as well. Josegiraffio Want to talk 10:42, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Support (0)

Neutral(0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.