Simpsons Wiki
No edit summary
(removed irrelevant catagories)
Tag: Visual edit
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;"
 
{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;"
 
|<center>[[File:Archive filingcabinent.png|50px]]</center>
 
|<center>[[File:Archive filingcabinent.png|50px]]</center>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
'''Past Nominations:''' [[Wikisimpsons:Featured episode/Past Nominations|1]]
+
'''Past Nominations:''' [[Simpsons Wiki:Featured episode/Past Nominations|1]]
   
 
|-
 
|-
Line 11: Line 10:
   
 
[[File:Episodenominate.jpg|thumb|300px]]
 
[[File:Episodenominate.jpg|thumb|300px]]
The '''featured episode''' are articles that represent the best [[Wikisimpsons]] has to offer.
+
The '''featured episode''' are articles that represent the best [[Simpsons Wiki]] has to offer.
   
   
Line 21: Line 20:
 
#...be unbiased, non-point of view
 
#...be unbiased, non-point of view
 
#...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 
#...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
#...follow the [[Wikisimpsons:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]
+
#...follow the [[Simpsons Wiki:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]
 
#...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 
#...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 
#...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 
#...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
Line 47: Line 46:
   
 
Also remember to add '''<nowiki>{{Nominatedep}}</nowiki>''' at the top of the article you are nominating.
 
Also remember to add '''<nowiki>{{Nominatedep}}</nowiki>''' at the top of the article you are nominating.
 
== Featured episode nominations ==
 
== July 2010 ==
 
==[[Mr. Lisa Goes To Washington|Mr. Lisa Goes to Washington]]==
 
One of the best episode articles on the site, complete with references, appearances, credits and quotes. {{Unsigned|ThePlatypus|02:59, May 7, 2010}}
 
 
=== Support (7) ===
 
#Looks like a good article. All things in order. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian;">[[User:Solar Dragon|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="red">Solar</font> <font color="blue">Dragon</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<font color="gold">Talk</font>]])</sup></span>☆ 05:09, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
#It should be a featured episode. {{User:TheHomer/sig}} 01:54, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Looks great. [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 04:24, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 
#saw nothing wrong, locke97 10:21 july 5, 2010
 
#Yup. Looks alright. {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 20:30, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Looks like a good one!! kev379 16:56 July 23, 2010
 
#Go for it, man![[User:KevlarNinja|KevlarNinja]] 14:16, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
#I love this episode... count me in. [[User:Mitchell.friedman|Mitchell.friedman]] 22:56, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
=== Oppose (0) ===
 
 
=== Neutral (0) ===
 
 
=== Comments ===
 
 
=== Comments ===
 
I've added some trivia after nominating the article. [[User:Alexandersig|Alexandersig]] 22:54, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Blood Feud]]==
 
I'd like to nominate [[Blood Feud]], it might need more trivia & quotes, but all tabs complete. Don't actually care if featured or not. [[User:Dohayecarumbadoh|Dohayecarumbadoh]] 01:49, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Support (2)===
 
#Looks fine. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian;">[[User:Solar Dragon|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="red">Solar</font> <font color="blue">Dragon</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<font color="gold">Talk</font>]])</sup></span>☆ 05:06, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Not the longest article, but at least it has all its tabs in order unlike so many other episode articles. - [[User:ThePlatypus|ThePlatypus]] 12:32, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Oppose (0)===
 
 
===Neutral (2)===
 
#It is a good episode article, but I think the plot could be longer. {{User:TheHomer/sig}} 00:43, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Agreed with TheHomer; the plot could be longer. [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 04:23, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Comments===
 
 
==[[Who Shot Mr. Burns? (Part Two)|Who Shot Mr Burns? (Part Two)]]==
 
A detailed and colorful article about one of the most legendary episodes of the series, includes notes on hidden clues to find out who shot Mr. Burns. Clearly deserves to be a featured article!! ;) [[User:Gonhegon|Gonhegon]] 10:51, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Support (5)===
 
# One of my favourite articles, which just happens to be one of the best on this wiki. HUGE article with all the details needed. Yes from me! {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 11:27, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Seems good enough to me. {{User:Solar Dragon/Signature}} 11:51, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Should definitely be featured. [[User:Dohayecarumbadoh|Dohayecarumbadoh]] 18:07, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Awesome Article
 
#Yeahh! [[User:Ned Flanders 23|Ned Flanders 23]] 18:01, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Neutral (0)===
 
 
===Oppose (0)===
 
 
===Comments===
 
 
==[[The Bob Next Door]]==
 
An article with a HUGE plot summay and complete tabs. {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 17:21, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Support (5)===
 
#Great article in my opinion. Full list of appearances and a massive amount of references and trivia. {{User:Solar Dragon/Signature}} 07:00, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 
#I love this episode and this article. Its got a full appearences list which some episodes don't have! [[User:Qazwsx1|Qazwsx1]]
 
#I must say, that episode description nicely put!The Fayster 23:41, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Is voting still going on? If so, I vote![[User:TreehouseOfBiscuit|TreehouseOfBiscuit]] 19:26, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Yessshhhhhh! [[User:Ned Flanders 23|Ned Flanders 23]] 18:01, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Neutral (2)===
 
#The plot is huge and well written, but it lacks pictures and is poor in extra details such as how it was received by the audience, or production notes. Good and complete tabs, but I still think that there are better options. Still great though! ;) [[User:Gonhegon|Gonhegon]] 18:17, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
#It's a very good article, but the credits section needs massive expansion in my opinion. >[[User:Dohayecarumbadoh|<span style="color:blue">D'oh! !Ay Carumba! D'oh!</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Dohayecarumbadoh|<span style="color:turquoise">Talk Page This-Away!</span>]])''</small> 03:31, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 
===Oppose (2)===
 
#The Credits tab is incomplete and the Quotes tab needs to be expanded. The General tab could definitely use some information about production notes and critical reaction, both of which are certainly of interest in a Sideshow Bob episode. On the flip side, the Appearances and References tabs look great. To sum up, this has the makings of being a great episode article, but as it stands now, it has no business even being nominated to be a featured episode. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 12:19, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Per above. Plus what about them other Flanderers. [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 15:41, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Comments===
 
If someone could sort out the Credits tab, then that would be great. I'll try and sort it out, eventually. {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 06:44, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
*This is on hold until the disputed voice actor is out of the way. {{User:Solar Dragon/Signature}} 21:02, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
**Problem sorted. Nomination is back on. {{User:Solar Dragon/Signature}} 15:13, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
*The Walt Warren voice actor mystery is back on. A U.C. added Simon Rouse as the guest voice for Walt Warren, but I can't find any corroboration anywhere. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 13:20, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
**If need be, I'll with-draw the episode from the nominations. This was nominated for last month anyway, so I dont mind. {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 18:34, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
**The episode is being re-run on Fox tonight, and I'm going to DVR it and go through the credits with a fine-toothed comb. Maybe that'll shed some light on the voice actor mystery. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 01:24, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
 
***Still a mystery. The only voice actor in the credits other than the regulars is Kelsey Grammer. No David Cross or Simon Rouse to be found. My personal suspicion now is that Dan Castellaneta voiced Walt, as Walt sounds a lot like Gil and Dan C. is Gil's voice actor. We still need something official, though. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 00:54, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
   
 
== [[Bart the Genius]] ==
 
== [[Bart the Genius]] ==
 
For the July nominations, I'd like to submit [[Bart the Genius]], as it is an excellent article, and is what all the others should conform to be like. All tabs complete for a great episode! {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 18:31, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
For the July nominations, I'd like to submit [[Bart the Genius]], as it is an excellent article, and is what all the others should conform to be like. All tabs complete for a great episode! {{User:Effluvium/sig}} 18:31, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
   
=== Support (2) ===
+
=== Support (5) ===
 
#The plot could use a little work, but overall it looks great. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 18:12, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
 
#The plot could use a little work, but overall it looks great. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 18:12, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Count this vote as 2! <span style="font-family:Elephant">[[User:TheSimpsons|'''<span style="color:red">The</span><span style="color:blue">Simpsons</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:TheSimpsons|'''<span style="color:gold">Talk</span>''']]</sup></span> 20:24, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Count this vote as 2! <span style="font-family:Elephant">[[User:TheSimpsons|'''<span style="color:red">The</span><span style="color:blue">Simpsons</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:TheSimpsons|'''<span style="color:gold">Talk</span>''']]</sup></span> 20:24, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
  +
#I think the article is good and I enjoy the episode![[User:Gourleyo|Gourleyo]] <small>Visit my [[User_talk:Gourleyo|talk]]!</small> 14:52, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
  +
#The article well written and the episode is a favorite of mine.[[User:Duncanfan2000|Duncanfan2000]] 17:51, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
  +
#I just want it to change, so I'm in. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Randomno|Randomno]] ([[User talk:Randomno|talk]]) </small><small>16:16, December 15, 2011 (UTC)</small>
   
 
=== Neutral (0) ===
 
=== Neutral (0) ===
   
=== Oppose (0) ===
+
=== Oppose (1) ===
  +
  +
#Production and Legacy sections copied word for word from Wikipedia. [[User:Gran2|Gran2]] 20:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
   
 
=== Comments ===
 
=== Comments ===

Revision as of 18:19, 8 February 2020

Archive filingcabinent

Past Nominations: 1

Episodenominate

The featured episode are articles that represent the best Simpsons Wiki has to offer.


So just what makes a featured episode? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...

  1. ...be well written and detailed
  2. ...be unbiased, non-point of view
  3. ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
  4. ...follow the Manual of Style
  5. ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
  6. ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
  7. ...have a succint proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
  8. ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
  9. ...have no red link tabs



EpisodeNominations

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an episode you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured episode list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured episode".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add {{Nominatedep}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Bart the Genius

For the July nominations, I'd like to submit Bart the Genius, as it is an excellent article, and is what all the others should conform to be like. All tabs complete for a great episode!    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   18:31, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Support (5)

  1. The plot could use a little work, but overall it looks great. -- Mythigator 18:12, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Count this vote as 2! TheSimpsons Talk 20:24, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I think the article is good and I enjoy the episode!Gourleyo Visit my talk! 14:52, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
  4. The article well written and the episode is a favorite of mine.Duncanfan2000 17:51, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
  5. I just want it to change, so I'm in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomno (talk) 16:16, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (1)

  1. Production and Legacy sections copied word for word from Wikipedia. Gran2 20:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Comments